Low-level light therapy: Applied Research and Clinics
The electromagnetic radiation is the key to safe and effective medical therapies, but only when applied at specific wavelengths and power levels.
Sunlight not only enables humans to produce vitamin D in their bodies, but can to cure many maladies. The application of natural and synthetic forms of electromagnetic radiation - formerly called biostimulation, now more commonly known as low-level light therapy (LLLT) or photonic therapy - is entirely a matter of wavelength, power level, and duration.
Since its beginnings in 1967, when Hungarian physician and surgeon Endre Mester used ruby and helium-neon (He-Ne) lasers for studies in wound healing, LLLT has remained an active area of research, with companies like Irradia (Stockholm, Sweden), MedSolution (Radolfzell, Germany), SpectraVET (Oak Laser Therapeutics (Tucson, AZ), Erchonia Medical (McKinney, TX), and Theralase Technologies (Toronto, ON, Canada) offering hundreds of wavelength-specific LLLT solutions.
In 2002, the ML 830 laser from MicroLight Corporation of
When discussing LLLT, it is important to distinguish it as the direct application of laser, LED, or other structured light to a patient for the purpose of offering some healing benefit.
The red and infrared light has proven effects at the cellular level, repairing mitochondrial and messenger DNA to support and maintain metabolism in the cell and promote healing.
Longer infrared wavelengths at 830 nm offer the greatest tissue penetration depth for muscle-healing applications. For example, Inman points to a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of LLLT in 90 subjects with chronic neck pain using a 300 mW, 830 nm laser at Castle Hill Medical Centre in Australia. The study showed that LLLT, with the parameters used in the study, was effective in providing pain relief for patients with chronic neck pain over a period of three months.
The Oralase device from MedX Health (
A study of 5000 patients showed that high-dose, cold laser light can improve such hearing problems as tinnitus, oversensitive hearing, ear pressure, vertigo, and even hearing loss. 4 Lutz Wilden, a medical doctor and LLLT specialist practicing in Germany (www.dr-wilden.de), said the study revealed that LLLT improved hearing loss by 20% on average, with younger patients showing improvement up to 25 decibels or 50%. The study showed that wavelengths between 630 and 830 nm excited the production of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which is produced by cell mitochondria, causing natural and accelerated regeneration of hearing cells.
Shorter wavelengths at 577 nm (yellow light) are exactly matched to the main absorption peak of oxygenated hemoglobin and are crucial to photocoagulation treatments that slow the progression of macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy; Coherent (Santa Clara, CA) won the 2008 PhAST/Laser Focus World Innovation Award for its optically pumped semiconductor laser (OPSL) targeting this 577 nm wavelength.
The even shorter 532 nm wavelength output from a potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser has a profound effect on healing diabetic and other ulcerated open wounds that do not heal after months of traditional treatment with antibiotic and other creams. With a single treatment consisting of 60 mW, 532 nm laser light at 0.5 J/cm2 applied to the central portion of the wound, working in concert with 650 nm 1.0 J/cm2 light applied at the wound edges and 240 mW of 904 nm light applied just outside the wound, Swedish Laser Medical Society (SLMS) certified laser therapist Christina Bäckström and colleagues from Irradia (Stockholm, Sweden) have demonstrated complete healing of ulcers and burns with as little as seven (one per week) five-minute treatments.
Canadian researchers demonstrated even finer LLLT wavelength specificity by showing that 290 to 320 nm light, but not the 254 nm light studied previously, was instrumental in cellular processes that can prevent skin cancer.
A 2006 article in Lasers in Surgery and Medicine reports that low-level doses of laser irradiation have “a stimulatory influence on wounded fibroblasts with an increase in cell proliferation and cell viability without adversely increasing the amount of cellular and molecular damage.” For example,
Andrei P. Sommer, senior scientist in the Nanobionic Laboratory at the
Sommer cites a pioneering study in 1981 that irradiated the open-skin wounds of rats daily with a He-Ne laser (632.8 nm) and an argon laser (514.5 nm) at 45 mW/cm2. The He-Ne laser radiation had a statistically significant stimulating effect on collagen synthesis in the wound, with a maximum effect at an energy density of 4 J/cm2 and the rate of wound closure was enhanced significantly between the third and twelfth postoperative days. The argon-laser exposure produced a significant increase in collagen concentration; however, an acceleration of the healing rate was not seen in this case. The study surmises that there is a wavelength-selective influence of coherent light on the metabolic and proliferation processes in wound healing. With higher exposures at 20 J/cm2, wound healing was inhibited.
Even though “cold lasers” used in LLLT applications are considered nonthermal and safe, the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database reports that patient burns and pain during therapeutic treatment are not unheard of. “The key to safe application of low-level laser light is keeping the radiation at a low level,” says Michael Barbour, president and founder of MicroLight. “The FDA has designated any laser with a power level below 100 mW as a nonheating laser with ‘NHN’ designation; devices above 100 mW that relieve pain through heating are designated ‘ILY.’ Our MicroLight laser is a 90 mW Class IIIb device with no negative patient reports. Unfortunately, many of the Class IV laser and LED devices coming on the market today have higher powers and are burning people.”
The 2006 Lasers in Surgery and Medicine report previously cited also warns, “Higher [laser intensity] doses were characterized by a decrease in cell viability and cell proliferation with a significant amount of damage to the cell membrane and DNA.” Barbour believes the key to success of LLLT is to provide true nonthermal, low-power-level laser devices to the marketplace and educating physicians and clinicians about safe and effective use of such therapies.
REFERENCES
1. E. Mester, B. Szende, and J. G. Tota, Kiserl Orvostud 19, p. 628 (1967).
2. www.laserworld.org, the Swedish Laser Medical Society LLLT Internet Guide, listing editorial, scientific abstracts, manufacturers of LLLT equipment.
3. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16806710?dopt=AbstractPlus.
4. L. Wilden and D. Ellerbrock, Lasermedizin 14, p. 129 (1998).
5. G. Mathonnet et al., PNAS 100(12) p. 7219 (June 10, 2003).
6. D. H. Hawkins et al., Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 38, p. 74 (2006).
7. A.P. Sommer and D. Zhu,
8. J. S. Kana et al., Archives of Surgery 116(3) p. 293 (March 1981).
9. www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfMAUDE/search.CFM.
Vasil Sidorov 15.07. 2009. E-mail: sidorovvasil@gmail.com
from Laser Focus World
Comments
-
No comments